authorityresearch.com

In Defense Of "Lust" And Iniquity.
(The role/duty of "'contemporary' education and educators.")

by
Dean Gotcher

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

"Educators" are no longer interested in children knowing the difference between right and wrong, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order (as in the "old" world order aka "old school") to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the father's/Father's will but are interested instead in their "esteeming" their "self," 'justifying' their carnal nature, i.e., their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world is stimulating, hating restraint, i.e., hating the father's/Father's authority that gets in the way—in order (as in "new" world order) for them (including the "educator") to do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust") without having a guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders), so they can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., be "of and for self" ("lust") with impunity, without accountability. Truth is no longer the agenda but entertainment, i.e., having "fun," making 'truth' subjective, i.e., subject to "lust." Replacing discussion with dialogue (making dialogue, i.e., "self interest," i.e., the "affective domain," i.e., the child's "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating—which includes his or her desire for "the group's" approval, i.e., affirmation—a part of the curriculum) accomplishes the deed (praxis), turning the child against the father's/Father's authority, i.e., against doing the father's/Father' will, resulting in the child questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking his/His (their parent's) authority instead.

"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, ...; seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." Hosea 4:6

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right') By making pleasure the standard for "good" anyone who inhibits or blocks the child from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates, in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth becomes the source of "evil," 'justifying' in the child's eyes their negation, for the sake of not only child's "wellbeing" but also for the sake of "worldly peace and socialist harmony."

"Concerning the changing of circumstances by men, the educator must himself be educated." (Karl Marx, Thesis on Feuerbach # 3) Whoever controls the child's upbringing, i.e., education, determines his paradigm, i.e., how he feels, thinks, and acts toward his "self," others, and the world, as well as how he responds to authority. By the "educator" 'changing' the classroom curriculum (the child's learning environment) from 1) preaching commands and rules to be obey as give, teaching facts and truth to be accepted as is, by faith, and discussing with the students any questions they might have regarding the commands, rules, facts, and truth being taught, at the teachers discretion, i.e., providing they deem it necessary, have time, the students are capable of understanding and are not questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking authority, 2) blessing or rewarding those students who obey and do things right, 3) chastening or correcting those students who do things wrong and/or disobey, and 4) casting out (expelling) those students who question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack authority to the students dialoguing their opinions to a consensus (there is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, opinions, or in the consensus process, there is only the students carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., "self interests" which the world stimulates) the student's are 'liberated' from their parent's authority, not only in their thoughts but also in their actions, with "the group's," i.e., the classroom's (and the "educator's") approval, i.e., affirmation. The "educator" does not have to tell the students to question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack their parent's authority when they get home from school (telling them would be "old school," maintain the "old" world order of being told, even if it was done for the purpose of 'change,' i.e., creating a "new" world order), if they were not already doing that, all they have to do is use a curriculum in the classroom that "encourages" (participating in the process results in "the group's" approval, i.e., affirmation, refusing to participate or fight against the process results in "the group's" rejection, i.e., the students natural desire for group approval and fear of group rejection forces him to participate), i.e., pressures the students to dialogue their opinions to a consensus and they will challenge, question, defy, disregard, attack their parent's authority when they get home from school automatically, with the "educator's" the students, and the schools approval—with the school defending the "educators," the students, and the child (their/his "feelings") over and therefore against the parent's authority (established commands, rules, facts, and truth), pressuring the parents to participate in the process as well, abdicating their authority to the school, the "educators," and their children, 'justifying' the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process. "Educators" have to be trained (continuously trained) in how to do this process in the classroom, called "life long learning" not of facts and truth but of how to apply the process of 'change' in 'changing' times.

The role and duty of "educators" today is to "prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space," so students (the next generation of citizens) can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., be their "self," i.e., love the world and hate restraint, i.e., "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates and practice iniquity with impunity. (Wilfred Bion, A Memoir of the Future) "Educators" are 'liberating' students from their parent's authority not only for the students sake, so the students can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., practice iniquity without fear of being judged, condemned, and/or cast out (expelled) but for their own sake as well, so they can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., practice iniquity without fear of being judged, condemned, and/or cast out (fired), with the students and the schools approval, i.e., affirmation. By the "educator" 'justifying'' the child's carnal nature, "lust" and iniquity are not only 'justified' in the child's eyes but in the "educators" eyes as well.

KNOWING the truth (doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, HAVING BEEN TOLD) is no longer the agenda of "educators." Suspending the truth, as upon a cross, in order for the child to 'discover' the 'truth' aka experience ('know') the 'truth' for himself (which comes from within and from the world which stimulates it) is now the agenda. "Educators" are now defending ('justifying') the child's carnal nature, i.e., "lust," negating the child having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning ("lusting") in the process. The idea ('logic' aka ideology aka agenda) being: if the father's/Father's authority, i.e., doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth engenders a guilty conscience in the child (you) for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, then having a guilty conscience for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world is stimulating disappears, i.e., is negated, i.e., no longer exists if the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth is negated—which is accomplished by "esteeming" ('justifying') his "self," i.e., his "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, 'justifying' his hatred toward (and removal aka negation of) anyone who is 'judgmental,' prejudiced, negative, hateful, divisive, intolerant, etc., accusing him of "lusting," making him "feel" bad for being "normal"—doing so without having a guilty conscience. This is the agenda of "educators" today, defending "lust," i.e., your child's (and their) carnal nature. By 'liberating' your child (and themselves) from being labeled as sinners, they can sin, i.e., "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating without having a guilty conscience, turning your child against your (and Gods) authority in the process.

"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

In defending "lust," i.e., loving the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority, i.e., doing the father's/Father's will, hating restraint, i.e., hating the father's/Father's authority that gets in the way, "educators" have become Marxists, promoting Marxism (training your child to be a Marxist) in the classroom.

Since "lust" is what all children have in common, it is through the child's carnal desire ("lust") to be a part of "the group," 'discovering' his "self" (identity) in the "collective," he is able to 'liberate' his "self" from the father's/Father's authority, to become his "self," i.e., to of and for the world only, "lusting" after the carnal pleasure of the 'moment' that the world stimulates (that "the group" 'justifies' aka affirms).

In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory)

Karl Marx explained the problem (the father's/Father's authority, that gets in the way of "lust") and the solution (how the child can become his "self" again, "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates without having a guilty conscience).

"Once the earthly family [with children having to humble and deny their "self" in order to do their father's will] is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family [with the Son, Jesus Christ, and all following Him having to humble and deny their "self" in order to do His Heavenly Father's will], the former [the earthly father's authority system, with children having to trust in (have faith in) and obey the father (their parents)] must then itself be destroyed [vernichtet, i.e., annihilated, i.e., negated] in theory and in practice [negated in the children's personal thoughts and social actions—resulting in their no longer "fellowshipping" with one another based upon the father's/Father's (their parents/God's) commands, rules, facts, and truth but, through dialogue, "building relationship" with one another based upon their common carnal desires, i.e., "self interests," i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment']." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)

"It is not individualism [the child having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, having to stand alone against "the group" when they are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting"] that fulfills the individual, on the contrary it destroys him [makes him "neurotic"—caught between doing the father's/Father's will and doing his own will instead, when his will, i.e., his carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment,' and his father's/Father's will, i.e., doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth are in conflict with one another]. Society ["human relationship based upon self interest," i.e., "building relationship" with others, based upon the child's carnal desires, i.e., one's "self interest," i.e., finding one's identity, i.e., "self" in the other, i.e., in "the group," i.e., in society] is the necessary framework through which freedom [from the father's/Father's authority] and individuality [to be "of and for self" and the world only] are made realities." (Karl Marx, in John Lewis, The Life and Teachings of Karl Marx)

Georg Hegel identified where the "educator's" focus should be—not in obeying the father/Father, i.e., doing the father's/Father's will (that gets in the way of the child's "enjoying the present"), but in recognizing and 'justifying' the child's carnal nature, i.e., his "enjoying the present," i.e., his "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates. If you start with the child's carnal nature aka "lust," 'justifying' it then the father's/Father's authority becomes null and void, i.e., of no worth or value in the child's thoughts and actions. By starting with "Ye shall not surely die:" i.e., removing the Father's authority, i.e., the consequence of disobedience the child can "lust," i.e., disobey with impunity. Genesis 3:4

"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world), of (and now for) "self" and the world only]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

Marx's ideology, i.e., the 'liberation' of "self" from the father's/Father's authority ("self-actualization")—so children can be their "self," doing wrong, disobeying, sinning ("lusting") with impunity (without having a guilty conscience)—is common practice (the curriculum) in education today. By making the child's "sense experience" ("pride of life"), i.e., his "sensuous needs" of the 'moment' ("lust of the flesh") and his "sense perception" of the situation ("lust of the eyes") the means to truth, i.e., 'reality,' i.e., what is 'actual,' faith in the father/Father, i.e., accepting his/His authority, i.e., doing his/His will is negated.

"Self-actualizing people have to a large extent transcended the values of their culture [their parent's/God's authority aka the father's/Father's authority]. They are not so much merely Americans as they are world citizens, members of the human species first and foremost." (Abraham Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature)

"Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

"Nakedness is absolutely right. So is the attack on antieroticism, the Christian & Jewish foundations." (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)

"I have found whenever I ran across authoritarian students [those students who insist upon doing the father's/Father's will, insisting that other students do the same, making them "feel" guilty when they disobey] that the best thing for me to do was to break their backs immediately." "The correct thing to do with authoritarians is to take them realistically for the bastards they are and then behave toward them as if they were bastards." (Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management)

Karl Marx resides in the heart of your child. If your child does not learn to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, doing the father's/Father's will, the Karl Marx in your child's heart, "lusting" after carnal pleasure of the 'moment,' hating restraint, i.e., hating the father's/Father's authority will rise up and negate you and anyone else (the unborn, elderly, righteous) who gets in the way of his carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., his "lusts."

"The heart is deceitful above all things [thinking pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., having to set aside your carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, taking pleasure in doing the father's/Father's will instead of yours], and desperately wicked [hating the father's/Father's authority that "gets in the way," i.e. that prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks you from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates]: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9

Sigmund Freud had the same agenda as Karl Marx, i.e., the negation of the father's/Father's authority so children (he) could do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity, i.e., without having a guilt conscience. Question psychology today, even in the "church" and see where that gets you. The children, according to Freud needed to not only "collectively kill" the father, but "collectively devour" the father as well in order to leave no trace of him, i.e., his authority for the next generation of children to know of—and try to emulate. There is no recognition (and acceptance) of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "Because I said so," "It is written," "Can not," "Must not," "Thou shalt not" in dialogue, only the "I feel" and "I think" of the child, 'justifying' his desire for ("lusting" after) the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates. Sigmund Freud wrote:

"'It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same [the father no longer exercises his authority over his children in the home]." "... the hatred against patriarchal suppression—a 'barrier to incest,' ... the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." (Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: a psychological inquiry into Freud)

Maslow noted Freud's goal of 'liberating' your child from your authority (as a parent) was in harmony with Marx's goal of 'liberating' society from God's authority.

"Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, i.e., including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions [an environment void of the father's/Father's authority where children can "actualize" their "self" without fear of judgment or condemnation] are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions [where children have to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do the father's/Father's aka their parents will] stunt human nature,... This is to say, one could reinterpret Marx into a self-actualization-fostering Third- and Fourth-Force psychology-philosophy. And my impression is anyway that this is the direction in which they are going now." "The whole discussion becomes species-wide, One World." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version & the Humanistic. (Better add to definition of "humanistic" that it also means one species, One World.)" (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)

There was no room for the father's/Father's (parental) authority in Maslow's, Rogers', Freud's, Marx's, and Hegel's world nor is there room for the father's/Father's (parental) authority in the contemporary "educators" classroom today. There is only room for the carnal nature of the child, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world is stimulating, hating the father's/Father's (parental/your) authority for getting in his way. Hate, for the child, is anyone who accuses him of sin, i.e., who judges and condemns him for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world is stimulating, 'justifying' his hate of them.

The child can not see his hate of restraint, i.e., his resentment toward the father's/Father's authority as being evil, i.e., "wicked" ("desperately wicked") because his love of "self," i.e., his love of pleasure is in the way, blinding him to it (to his actions). Like a drug, pleasure (dopamine emancipation), which the world stimulates, blinds your child (and you) to his (and your) "wickedness"—which is being expressed toward any authority which is preventing (or trying to prevent) him from having access to it—the intoxicating, addictive, possessive drug of pleasure (dopamine emancipation)—making him not just wicked but "desperately wicked" if he perceives he can not have it (or have access to it) in the 'moment.' Pleasure in itself is not evil. God gave it to us that we might enjoy his creation, thanking and praising him for it. It becomes evil (or rather we become evil) when we love it more than him, making it the standard for "good." Only God is good. By making pleasure "good" it becomes God in our eyes (what we worship). With pleasure being "good" in the child's eyes, he can not see the price he will pay for making it the standard for life, believing in and following after anyone who, as a drug pusher, 'justifies' it—dying in his sins.

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

"There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Proverbs 16:25

"Contemporary" education, i.e., the "contemporary educator's" method of education is antithetical to the gospel message, i.e., is against doing the Father's will. Instead of the child being 'redeemed' by the Son's obedience to His Heavenly Father in all things commanded ('redeeming' us from His Father's judgment upon us for our sins), being 'reconciled' to the Father by the Father's raising him from the grave, so your child can spending eternity in the Father's love, joy, peace, glory, and holiness, the "educator" is 'redeeming' your child from the Father's authority, 'reconciling' him to his "self" and the world—so your child (and the educator) can "lust" after the things of the world without having a guilty conscience, dying in his (their) sins, spending eternity in the lake of fire that is never quenched. It is not academics taking place in the classroom, learning to do right and not wrong according to the truth taking place in the classroom, it is instead—following after the same pattern as Genesis 3:1-6, where the master facilitator of 'change,' i.e., master psychotherapist, in a garden called Eden, "helped" to "children" 'liberate' their "self" from the Father's authority, i.e., Hebrews 12:5-11, who, no longer having a guilty conscience for sinning, i.e., Romans 7:14-25, refused to repent, blaming someone else instead—secularized Satanism, intellectual witchcraft (what I call "Bloom's Taxonomy"). Change the curriculum, i.e., how the children are educated and you change their paradigm, i.e., how they think and act, i.e., how they respond to authority.

"The child takes on the characteristic behavior of the group in which he is placed. . . . he reflects the behavior patterns which are set by the adult leader of the group." (Kurt Lewin in Wilbur Brookover, A Sociology of Education)

Dialogue is the pathway of "lust," 'justifying' the child's "lusting" after it. Once you are on it you can not dialogue your way off. You must, humbling, denying, dying to your "self," repent, and (turning to the Son, believing in and following after Him, i.e., the truth) do the Father's will.

"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50

"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6

"Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it. For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works." Matthew 16:24-27

"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9

"... and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ." 1 John 1:3

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the student's "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., their love pleasures and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the child's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation," since the father's/Father's authority, and the guilty conscience which it engenders, is negative to the child's carnal nature), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human-ist resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal desires) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2019